 |
 |

Evaluation of Drug Utilization Review Programs
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr Hennessy and colleagues1 found that retrospective drug utilization review was not associated with any decrease in the rates of potential prescribing errors or hospitalizations. They also reported that these programs have changed little since 1996. Thus, it is possible that these results merely reflect ineffectiveness of "traditional" retrospective drug utilization review programs, which tend to have overly simplified criteria.
Unfortunately, the authors did not provide detailed definitions of such possible prescribing errors. For instance, many review criteria specify that patients should not receive more than 1 opioid analgesic at a time. Rather than this simple rule, however, several factors should be considered (eg, number of days of overlapping opioid therapy, diagnoses, number of physicians prescribing the opioids, and number of pharmacies filling the prescriptions) to identify the most appropriate course of action. Although Hennessy et al had access to medical claims data, it is not clear . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Robert Berringer, PharmD;
Ellen Friedla, PharmD, MPH;
Karen Rich, PharmD
Heritage Information Systems Inc Richmond, Va
RELATED ARTICLES
Evaluation of Drug Utilization Review Programs
Dale B. Christensen, William H. Campbell, Thomas R. Fulda, Mark C. Pugh, David H. Smith, Earlene E. Lipowski, Elgene W. Jacobs, Julie W. Kuhle, and Robert A. Crittenden
JAMA. 2004;291(2):185.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evaluation of Drug Utilization Review ProgramsReply
Sean Hennessy, Warren B. Bilker, Anita L. Weber, Colleen Brensinger, and Brian L. Strom
JAMA. 2004;291(2):185-186.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Retrospective Drug Utilization Review, Prescribing Errors, and Clinical Outcomes
Sean Hennessy, Warren B. Bilker, Lan Zhou, Anita L. Weber, Colleen Brensinger, Yanlin Wang, and Brian L. Strom
JAMA. 2003;290(11):1494-1499.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|