You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 2, January 14, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Medication Error
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evaluation of Drug Utilization Review Programs

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor. Dr Hennessy and colleagues1 concluded that "Given the lack of evidence for effectiveness and the suggestions from previous research for possible harm, policymakers should consider withdrawing the legislative mandate for retrospective drug use review." It is possible, however, that their negative results were related either to a lack of effectiveness of that particular intervention, or to inappropriate choice of outcome measures. Thus, we do not believe that their results warrant such a sweeping conclusion about drug utilization review in principle.

We have several specific concerns. First, the authors compared the rate of possible errors with the entire number of drug problem-alert criteria cross-sectionally at 2 different time periods. However, only a small fraction of these errors generated alert letters to physicians (ie, 1%-8% in 5 states, and 25% in only 1 state). To expect so few alert letters to affect the overall error rate is both statistically . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Dale B. Christensen, PhD; William H. Campbell, PhD
School of Pharmacy
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill

Thomas R. Fulda, MA
Center for the Advancement of Patient Safety
Columbia, Md (retired)

Mark C. Pugh, PharmD
Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield
Richmond, Va

David H. Smith, PhD
Kaiser Center for Health Research
Portland, Ore

Earlene E. Lipowski, PhD
College of Pharmacy
University of Florida
Gainesville

Elgene W. Jacobs, PhD
University of Oklahoma College of Pharmacy
Oklahoma City

Julie W. Kuhle, RPh
Iowa Pharmacy Association
Des Moines

Robert A. Crittenden, MD, MPH
Harborview Medical Center
Seattle, Wash



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Evaluation of Drug Utilization Review Programs
Robert Berringer, Ellen Friedla, and Karen Rich
JAMA. 2004;291(2):184-185.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Drug Utilization Review Programs—Reply
Sean Hennessy, Warren B. Bilker, Anita L. Weber, Colleen Brensinger, and Brian L. Strom
JAMA. 2004;291(2):185-186.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Retrospective Drug Utilization Review, Prescribing Errors, and Clinical Outcomes
Sean Hennessy, Warren B. Bilker, Lan Zhou, Anita L. Weber, Colleen Brensinger, Yanlin Wang, and Brian L. Strom
JAMA. 2003;290(11):1494-1499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.