You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 21, June 2, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Controversies
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •World Health
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic

CLINICIAN'S CORNER
Scientific Rationale for a Change in the Composition of Oral Rehydration Solution

Christopher Duggan, MD, MPH; Olivier Fontaine, MD; Nathaniel F. Pierce, MD; Roger I. Glass, MD, PhD; Dilip Mahalanabis, MD; Nur Haque Alam, MD; Maharaj K. Bhan, MD; Mathuram Santosham, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2004;291:2628-2631.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Diarrheal diseases remain important causes of death and morbidity in developing countries, with an estimated 1.5 billion episodes and 1.5 million to 2.5 million deaths each year among children younger than 5 years.1-4 Although the number of children currently dying from diarrhea continues to be unacceptably high, it is substantially lower than the 5 million deaths per year estimated 20 years ago.5

A critical factor in this reduction in diarrhea deaths has been the widespread adoption of oral rehydration solution (ORS) programs for the treatment and prevention of diarrhea-associated dehydration.6-7 Indeed, ORS has been hailed as one of the most important medical advances of the past century,8 at least in part because of its simplicity, low cost, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Advantages of Reduced-Osmolarity ORS

Author Affiliations: Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Mass (Dr Duggan); Child and Adolescent Health and Development, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland (Dr Fontaine); Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md (Drs Pierce and Santosham); Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga (Dr Glass); Society for Applied Studies, Kolkata, India (Dr Mahalanabis); Clinical Sciences Division, ICDDR, B Centre for Health and Population Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh (Dr Alam); and Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi (Dr Bhan).


RELATED ARTICLE

Clinical Concerns About Reduced-Osmolarity Oral Rehydration Solution
David R. Nalin, Norbert Hirschhorn, William Greenough, III, George J. Fuchs, and Richard A. Cash
JAMA. 2004;291(21):2632-2635.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

MAPKAPK-2 Is a Critical Signaling Intermediate in NHE3 Activation Following Na+-Glucose Cotransport
Hu et al.
J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:24247-24253.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Symptomatic hyponatremia during treatment of dehydrating diarrheal disease with reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution.
Alam et al.
JAMA 2006;296:567-573.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

CFTR in cystic fibrosis and cholera: from membrane transport to clinical practice
Goodman and Percy
Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2005;29:75-82.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.