You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 21, June 2, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Controversies
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Gastroenterology
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

CLINICIAN'S CORNER
Clinical Concerns About Reduced-Osmolarity Oral Rehydration Solution

David R. Nalin, MD; Norbert Hirschhorn, MD; William Greenough III, MD; George J. Fuchs, MD; Richard A. Cash, MD

JAMA. 2004;291:2632-2635.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Demonstration of the benefits of oral therapy for cholera in 19681 soon led to application of the method to all forms of infectious diarrheal diseases.2 The original oral rehydration solution (ORS) formulation developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) (Table 1) struck a compromise between the ideal solutions for these diverse disorders to meet the programmatic goal of a single formulation and packaging for global use in cholera and noncholera diarrheas, in both adults and children. Recently, WHO recommended a new oral solution (Table 1) for all acute diarrheas, including cholera. This new formula would replace the original ORS, which saved millions of lives, with a new formulation containing less sodium and glucose.3 This change was ostensibly to reduce gross stool volume and use of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Consequence of a Lower-Sodium Solution

Author Affiliations: Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (Dr Hirschhorn); Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (Dr Greenough); University of Arkansas Medical School, Little Rock (Dr Fuchs); and Harvard School of Public Health, Camrbidge, Mass (Dr Cash).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Scientific Rationale for a Change in the Composition of Oral Rehydration Solution
Christopher Duggan, Olivier Fontaine, Nathaniel F. Pierce, Roger I. Glass, Dilip Mahalanabis, Nur Haque Alam, Maharaj K. Bhan, and Mathuram Santosham
JAMA. 2004;291(21):2628-2631.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Adherence to Oral Rehydration Therapy among In-Patient Children Aged 1-59 Months with Some or No Dehydration
Migowa et al.
J Trop Pediatr 2009;0:fmp059v1-fmp059.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Symptomatic hyponatremia during treatment of dehydrating diarrheal disease with reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution.
Alam et al.
JAMA 2006;296:567-573.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.