You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 23, June 16, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Primary Care/ Family Medicine
 •Psychiatry
 •Depression
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Interventions for Treatment of Depression in Primary Care—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Dr Coyne suggests that free medication and psychotherapy compromised the value of our intervention. In fact, our intervention addressed numerous barriers to adequate treatment, including both physician factors (eg, knowledge, competing demands) and patient factors (eg, denial, stigma, adverse effects). We also demonstrated the acceptability and effectiveness of using care managers to promote evidence-based treatment for in primary care. A next step is to increase patients' access to such care by reducing barriers affecting providers (eg, reimbursement) and practices (eg, organization, space).

Coyne also questions whether the differences in reduction of suicidal ideation translate into clinical benefits. We used the Scale for Suicidal Ideation because it has demonstrated predictive validity for actual suicide among psychiatric outpatients.1 We agree that differences in levels of suicidal ideation at follow-up between intervention and usual care were modest; indeed, we specifically stated that there was no significant difference between groups with respect . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Martha L. Bruce, PhD, MPH; George S. Alexopoulos, MD; Herbert C. Schulberg, PhD
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
White Plains, NY

Thomas Ten Have, PhD; Ira R. Katz, MD
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia

Charles F. Reynolds III, MD
ReynoldsCF@upmc.edu
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pa



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Interventions for Treatment of Depression in Primary Care
James C. Coyne
JAMA. 2004;291(23):2814.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interventions for Treatment of Depression in Primary Care
Jeremy Koppel
JAMA. 2004;291(23):2814.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interventions for Treatment of Depression in Primary Care
Christopher C. Colenda
JAMA. 2004;291(23):2815.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reducing Suicidal Ideation and Depressive Symptoms in Depressed Older Primary Care Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Martha L. Bruce, Thomas R. Ten Have, Charles F. Reynolds, III, Ira I. Katz, Herbert C. Schulberg, Benoit H. Mulsant, Gregory K. Brown, Gail J. McAvay, Jane L. Pearson, and George S. Alexopoulos
JAMA. 2004;291(9):1081-1091.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.