You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 4, January 28, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Infectious Diseases, Other
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Although we share the concerns of Dr Stelfox and colleagues1 about the negative outcomes of isolation, these must be weighed against the risks of infection with and transmission of resistant organisms. The authors' study design may have led to overestimation of the adverse effects of isolation.

Although patients who were colonized with MRSA were similar to uncolonized control patients with respect to most baseline factors, the authors did not control for previous hospitalization. Prior hospitalization and contact with the health care system are risk factors for MRSA colonization and infection.2 Previous hospitalization is also related to several of the outcomes measured in the study, such as pressure ulcers and falls, and may influence the diagnostic workup performed during subsequent admissions. For example, a patient with congestive heart failure is unlikely to undergo assessment of ventricular function if the same study had been performed during a recent hospitalization. . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Stephen G. Weber, MD, MS
Section of Infectious Diseases
University of Chicago Hospitals
Chicago, Ill

Trish M. Perl, MD, MSc; Sara E. Cosgrove, MD, MS
Division of Infectious Diseases
Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
Baltimore, Md



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Safety of Patients Isolated for Infection Control
, , and
JAMA. ;290():1899-1905.
FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control

JAMA. ;291():420-420.
FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control
and
JAMA. ;291():420-421.
FULL TEXT  

Quality of Care and Satisfaction Among Patients Isolated for Infection Control--Reply
, , and
JAMA. ;291():421-422.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.