You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 6, February 11, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Thrombolysis
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

"Cooling-Off" vs Immediate Revascularization for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Neumann and colleagues1 found that in patients with unstable coronary syndromes, those who had deferred catheter intervention for prolonged antithrombotic pretreatment ("cooling off") had somewhat worse outcomes than those who had immediate intervention accompanied by intense antiplatelet treatment.

I would appreciate it if the authors would provide additional details regarding the definitions and timing of nonfatal reinfarction. In particular, it is unclear how they decided whether to classify an infarction as an index event or as an end point. This seems especially problematic, as 67% of all patients had elevated levels of cardiac troponin T at presentation. It would be of interest to know how many patients in each group had elevated levels of creatine kinase and its MB isoenzyme at presentation. This is particularly important, as an end-point infarction was defined as "new Q waves in 2 or more contiguous electrocardiographic leads" in 11 of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Shaun Goodman, MD, MSc
Canadian Heart Research Centre
Toronto, Ontario



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

"Cooling-Off" vs Immediate Revascularization for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes—Reply
Franz-Josef Neumann, Adnan Kastrati, and Albert Schömig
JAMA. 2004;291(6):691-692.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Prolonged Antithrombotic Pretreatment ("Cooling-Off" Strategy) Before Intervention in Patients With Unstable Coronary Syndromes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Franz-Josef Neumann, Adnan Kastrati, Gisela Pogatsa-Murray, Julinda Mehilli, Hildegard Bollwein, Hans-Peter Bestehorn, Claus Schmitt, Melchior Seyfarth, Josef Dirschinger, and Albert Schömig
JAMA. 2003;290(12):1593-1599.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.