You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 6, February 11, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Thrombolysis
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

"Cooling-Off" vs Immediate Revascularization for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: In response to Dr Goodman, we convened an independent blinded end point committee to ensure unbiased assessment of events, as we stated in our article. Goodman is concerned about the differentiation between index infarctions that justified inclusion in the study and infarctions that subsequently occur as a complication. Indeed, this a problem in any study that includes patients with non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction and that concerns infarctions occurring within the first 8 hours after study entry. In our study, myocardial infarction within 8 hours from randomization occurred in 5 patients in the early intervention group and 6 patients in the prolonged pretreatment group. If anything, these infarctions may have blunted the principal finding of our study. If we exclude them from the analysis, the disadvantage of the prolonged pretreatment becomes even more pronounced (relative risk, 2.5 [95% confidence interval, 1.1-6.0]).

Goodman observes that the cumulative incidences for our primary . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Franz-Josef Neumann, MD
Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen
Krozingen, Germany

Adnan Kastrati, MD; Albert Schömig, MD
Deutsches Herzzentrum München
Klinik an der Technischen Universität München
Munich, Germany



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

"Cooling-Off" vs Immediate Revascularization for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
Shaun Goodman
JAMA. 2004;291(6):691.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Prolonged Antithrombotic Pretreatment ("Cooling-Off" Strategy) Before Intervention in Patients With Unstable Coronary Syndromes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Franz-Josef Neumann, Adnan Kastrati, Gisela Pogatsa-Murray, Julinda Mehilli, Hildegard Bollwein, Hans-Peter Bestehorn, Claus Schmitt, Melchior Seyfarth, Josef Dirschinger, and Albert Schömig
JAMA. 2003;290(12):1593-1599.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.