You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 6, February 11, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Controversies
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Ethics
 •Neurology
 •Coma/ Vegetative State
 •Transplantation
 •Transplantation, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Surrogate Consent for Living Related Organ Donation

UCLA Medical Center Ethics Committee
UCLA Renal Transplant Program*

JAMA. 2004;291:728-731.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

An increasing number of patients receive transplants of organs procured from living donors.1 Organ donors provide the "gift of life" because of a desire to help another individual. Usually the organ recipient is a close relative because affection and a desire for the well-being of the ill individual needing the transplant are also substantial incentives for donation. A recent consensus statement on the live organ donor noted that "the person who gives consent to be a live organ donor should be competent, willing to donate, free from coercion, . . . " and fully informed.2 This consensus statement does not explicitly address the potential for surrogates to consent to organ recovery from an incompetent adult, although such clinical circumstances present themselves occasionally.3 Some actively oppose surrogate consent, presumably because of anticipated negative effects on public perceptions about organ donation.4-5

We present . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Case Scenario

*Authors: The writing committee of the UCLA Medical Center Ethics Committee and UCLA Renal Transplant Program included Katherine Brown-Saltzman, RN, MA, Allison Diamant, MD, Iris Cohen Fineberg, PhD, MSW, H. Albin Gritsch, MD, Michael Keane, MD, Stanley Korenman, MD, Michelle Lewis, MD, JD, Marshall Morgan, MD, Les Rothenberg, JD, Alexander Tymchuk, PhD, Fredda Weiss, Irwin Weiss, MD, Neil Wenger, MD, and Fran Wiley, RN.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Surrogate Consent for Live Organ Donation
Katrina A. Bramstedt
JAMA. 2004;291(17):2077-2078.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surrogate Consent for Live Organ Donation—Reply
The Writing Committee of the UCLA Medical Center Ethics Committee and UCLA Renal Transplant Program
JAMA. 2004;291(17):2078.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Assessing the Ethical and Practical Wisdom of Surrogate Consent for Living Organ Donation
David Wendler and Ezekiel Emanuel
JAMA. 2004;291(6):732-735.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The acceptability of posthumous human ovarian tissue donation in Utah
Mizukami et al.
Hum Reprod 2005;20:3560-3565.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surrogate Consent for Live Organ Donation
Bramstedt
JAMA 2004;291:2077-2078.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.