You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 6, February 11, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Renal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Underutilization of Peritoneal Dialysis

James Heaf, MD

JAMA. 2004;291:740-742.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Considerable progress has been made during the past decade in the practice and theory of peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). One previous major concern was whether peritoneal dialysis could deliver enough clearance to meet targets for adequacy of dialysis. Patients can be divided into low and high peritoneal transport categories depending on measured clearance rates.1 Anuric "low transporters" were considered at particular risk for underdialysis. However, epidemiological studies showed paradoxically lower morbidity and mortality in this group.2 High transporters, while easily achieving conventional dialysis targets, were characterized by ultrafiltration failure (due to rapid loss of glucose, and thereby osmotic pressure, from the dialysis fluid), hypertension, excess peritoneal loss of albumin, and excess mortality.

Two solutions to this problem have been discovered. First, the widespread introduction of automated peritoneal dialysis, whereby dialysis fluid is exchanged frequently while the patient is asleep, improves ultrafiltration and reduces even . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Department of Nephrology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.


RELATED ARTICLE

Patient Ratings of Dialysis Care With Peritoneal Dialysis vs Hemodialysis
Haya R. Rubin, Nancy E. Fink, Laura C. Plantinga, John H. Sadler, Alan S. Kliger, and Neil R. Powe
JAMA. 2004;291(6):697-703.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Patients' views regarding choice of dialysis modality
Lee et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:3953-3959.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Why less success of the peritoneal dialysis programmes in Europe?
Biesen et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:1478-1481.
FULL TEXT  

Health status and quality of life reported by incident patients after 1 year on haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis
Kutner et al.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005;20:2159-2167.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

New Renal Failure Patients Prefer Peritoneal Dialysis over Hemodialysis
JWatch General 2004;2004:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.