You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 291 No. 7, February 18, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Health Policy
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Clinical Researcher—An "Emerging" Species

Ralph Snyderman, MD

JAMA. 2004;291:882-883.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The discrepancy between current medical practice and the capabilities for improvement is greater now than at any time since the early part of the last century. In the early 1900s, the emerging sciences of chemistry, biochemistry, anatomy, physiology, pathology, physics, and microbiology provided the potential to transform medical practice. Nonetheless, the field was anecdotal, unscientific, and unregulated. In 1910, the Flexner Report influenced the development of the modern academic medical center, where students are educated and trained by research-oriented faculty who practice in teaching hospitals.1 This integration of the core missions of education, research, and clinical care led to understanding the pathophysiologic basis of diseases and therapeutic modes capable of modifying them.

Fueled by enlightened federal investments in biomedical research, there has been an explosion in research capabilities, medical technologies, and allied industries. In particular, since the mid-1970s, the biotechnology revolution has fueled new sciences, including genomics, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Chancellor for Health Affairs, Duke University, Durham, NC.


RELATED LETTERS

The Debt Repayment Paradox for VA Clinical Investigators
Bevanne Bean-Mayberry, Adam J. Gordon, and Shawn L. Fultz
JAMA. 2004;291(19):2316.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Debt Repayment Paradox for VA Clinical Investigators—Reply
Ralph Snyderman
JAMA. 2004;291(19):2316.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

NIH Peer Review of Grant Applications for Clinical Research
Theodore A. Kotchen, Teresa Lindquist, Karl Malik, and Ellie Ehrenfeld
JAMA. 2004;291(7):836-843.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Optimal Timing for Use of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Questions, Answers, and More Questions
Mahaffey and Harrington
JAMA 2007;297:636-639.
FULL TEXT  

Strategies for Successful Patient Oriented Research: Why Did I (not) Get Funded?
Agarwal et al.
CJASN 2006;1:340-343.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A time of accelerated change in academic cardiovascular medicine: Implications for academic divisions of cardiology and their training programs
Califf et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1957-1965.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Debt Repayment Paradox for VA Clinical Investigators
Bean-Mayberry et al.
JAMA 2004;291:2316-2316.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.