You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 11, September 15, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Colon Cancer
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Gastroenterology
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Pitfalls of Converting Practice Guidelines Into Quality Measures

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Walter and colleagues find much to approve of in the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA's) system of performance measures—a key aspect of our improvements in quality health care over the past 10 years.1-3 However, the significant criticisms of our system that they offer require response.

The VHA's performance measures are developed by panels of clinicians, researchers, and quality experts (our Performance Measurement Workgroup) and undergo periodic evidence reviews. We set the benchmark for 18 externally comparable measures of disease prevention and treatment, from immunization to cancer screening. Our clinical performance measurement system focuses attention on problem areas and drives appropriate change. It is a significant part of VHA's strategy to provide world-class health care to 5 million veterans annually.

Colorectal cancer screening is one of many quality measures VHA continually evaluates and strives to improve. Most VA patients are well-served by regular CRC screenings, which are supported . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Barbara B. Fleming, MD, PhD
barbara.fleming@hq.med.va.gov
Department of Veterans Affairs
Veterans Health Administration
Washington, DC

Robert A. Petzel, MD
VA Midwest Health Care Network
Minneapolis, Minn
For the Performance Measurement Workgroup



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Pitfalls of Converting Practice Guidelines Into Quality Measures
Greg Pawlson, Sarah Hudson Scholle, and Philip Renner
JAMA. 2004;292(11):1301.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pitfalls of Converting Practice Guidelines Into Quality Measures—Reply
Louise C. Walter, Paul A. Heineken, and Kenneth E. Covinsky
JAMA. 2004;292(11):1302.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pitfalls of Converting Practice Guidelines Into Quality Measures: Lessons Learned From a VA Performance Measure
Louise C. Walter, Natalie P. Davidowitz, Paul A. Heineken, and Kenneth E. Covinsky
JAMA. 2004;291(20):2466-2470.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.