You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 13, October 6, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Men's Health
 •Prostate Disease
 •Oncology
 •Prostate Cancer
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Natural History of Early Localized Prostate Cancer—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Drs Osborn and Chodak consider Gleason histopathologic grading to be a "more accurate predictor of prognosis" than cytological assessment of differentiation. The implication of "accurate" is far from clear in this context. It could vary from the statistical precision of an effect estimate (such as 20-year survival) to the reliability of the factor or its performance in distinguishing fatal from nonfatal cancerous tumors (sensitivity, specificity, or predictive value). Prognostic factors do not exist in a vacuum; their purpose is to guide clinical management. Although the Gleason score conveys significant prognostic information, it is not obvious that a dichotomous clinical decision is better guided by the Gleason score with 10 discreet levels than by the 3 discreet categories of differentiation. In our data, degree of differentiation distinguishes groups with an almost 50-fold difference in risk of death from prostate cancer.1

Second, with respect to the appropriateness of generalizing our . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Jan-Erik Johansson, MD, PhD
jan-erik.johansson@orebroll.se

Ove Andrén, MD; Swen-Olof Andersson, MD, PhD; Anders Magnusson, BSc
Örebro University Hospital and
Center for Assessment of Medical Technology
Örebro, Sweden

Paul W. Dickman, PhD
Karolinska Institute
Stockholm, Sweden

Lars Holmberg, MD, PhD
Regional Oncologic Center
University Hospital
Uppsala, Sweden

Hans-Olov Adami, MD, PhD
Karolinska Institute
Stockholm, Sweden
Harvard School of Public Health
Boston, Mass



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Natural History of Early Localized Prostate Cancer
Jonathan R. Osborn and Gerald W. Chodak
JAMA. 2004;292(13):1549.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Natural History of Early Localized Prostate Cancer
Jaime Pujadas Oláno
JAMA. 2004;292(13):1549.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Natural History of Early, Localized Prostate Cancer
Jan-Erik Johansson, Ove Andrén, Swen-Olof Andersson, Paul W. Dickman, Lars Holmberg, Anders Magnuson, and Hans-Olov Adami
JAMA. 2004;291(22):2713-2719.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.