You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 15, October 20, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Chlorthalidone vs Other Low-Dose Diuretics

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Psaty and colleagues1 compared the results of 2 meta-analyses, each of which looked individually at the efficacy of either chlorthalidone or other low-dose diuretics compared with placebo, not with each other. Based on small efficacy differences, Psaty et al concluded that "major health outcomes for chlorthalidone and other thiazide-like drugs appear to be similar." We believe that it is necessary to directly compare treatments to reach conclusions about differences between them.

Evidence from active control clinical trials distinguishes chlorthalidone from diuretics that are similar but hardly identical.2 After an interim analysis at 5 years of follow-up in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT), the steering committee recommended that only chlorthalidone (and not hydrochlorothiazide) be used in the intervention arm.3 In the 9 clinics whose staff initially prescribed predominantly hydrochlorothiazide, coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality and all-cause mortality were increased by 44% and 16%, respectively, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Kenneth L. Choi, MD
kenneth_choi@rush.edu

Dave Chua, MD, MS; William J. Elliott, MD, PhD
Department of Preventive Medicine
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Ill


RELATED ARTICLES

Chlorthalidone vs Other Low-Dose Diuretics—Reply
Bruce M. Psaty, Thomas Lumley, and Curt D. Furberg
JAMA. 2004;292(15):1817.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Meta-analysis of Health Outcomes of Chlorthalidone-Based vs Nonchlorthalidone-Based Low-Dose Diuretic Therapies
Bruce M. Psaty, Thomas Lumley, and Curt D. Furberg
JAMA. 2004;292(1):43-44.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Major Outcomes in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)
The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group
JAMA. 2002;288(23):2981-2997.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Comparative Antihypertensive Effects of Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone on Ambulatory and Office Blood Pressure
Ernst et al.
Hypertension 2006;47:352-358.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.