You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 15, October 20, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Chlorthalidone vs Other Low-Dose Diuretics—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: We agree with Dr Choi and colleagues that direct comparisons within active control clinical trials are the optimal method of assessing differences between drugs. When the absence of active control data makes the use of indirect comparisons necessary, it is important to compare things that are similar.

Their reference to MRFIT1 is surprising on several counts. First, they make an indirect comparison between hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone even though the choice between the 2 diuretics was a local option and not a part of the randomized design. Second, for the randomized comparison between special intervention and usual care, MRFIT, which did not use a factorial design, has not generally been included in meta-analyses of hypertension trials2 because the effects of antihypertensive treatment cannot be separated from the effects of the MRFIT nutrition and smoking interventions. Finally, high-dose diuretics were used in MRFIT. These differ from low-dose diuretics in their . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Bruce M. Psaty, MD, PhD
psaty@u.washington.edu

Thomas Lumley, PhD
University of Washington
Seattle

Curt D. Furberg, MD, PhD
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, NC



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Chlorthalidone vs Other Low-Dose Diuretics
Kenneth L. Choi, Dave Chua, and William J. Elliott
JAMA. 2004;292(15):1816-1817.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Major Outcomes in High-Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)
The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group
JAMA. 2002;288(23):2981-2997.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.