You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 15, October 20, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Breast Cancer
 •Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

HER-2 Testing in Breast Cancer

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Yaziji and colleagues1 present a cogent argument for a cost-effective algorithmic approach to HER-2 testing of breast carcinoma based on a carefully conducted and executed study of 2963 samples. We would like to point out several issues not directly addressed in the article or the accompanying editorial.2

Three clinical assays have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for determination of HER-2 status of breast cancer: HercepTest (DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), Pathway (Ventana Medical Systems Inc, Tucson, Ariz), and PathVysion (Abbott Vysis, Abbott Park, Ill). The first 2 are immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays and PathVysion is a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay. Standardized scoring criteria have also been specified for each assay. The methods described by Yaziji et al did not use the first 2 FDA-approved IHC assays; rather, the DakoCytomation polyclonal antibody A0485 was used for IHC staining, not the approved HercepTest. Furthermore, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Raymond R. Tubbs, DO
tubbsr@ccf.org
Department of Clinical Pathology

David G. Hicks, MD
Department of Anatomic Pathology
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

HER-2 Testing in Breast Cancer—Reply
Hadi Yaziji, Todd S. Barry, and Allen M. Gown
JAMA. 2004;292(15):1818.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

HER-2 Testing in Breast Cancer Using Parallel Tissue-Based Methods
Hadi Yaziji, Lynn C. Goldstein, Todd S. Barry, Robert Werling, Harry Hwang, Georgiana K. Ellis, Julie R. Gralow, Robert B. Livingston, and Allen M. Gown
JAMA. 2004;291(16):1972-1977.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High-Quality HER-2 Testing: Setting a Standard for Oncologic Biomarker Assessment
Elizabeth L. Wiley and Leslie K. Diaz
JAMA. 2004;291(16):2019-2020.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.