 |
 |

Tenofovir, Equivalence, and NoninferiorityReply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: Although the terms "equivalence" and "noninferiority" are not strictly the same, we did use them interchangeably, as is commonly done.1 This study was designed as a noninferiority study with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 10% chosen as in the "Methods" section.
The 2-sided 95% CI of the difference between 2 trial arms is an appropriate and traditional method for assessing equivalence of 2 treatments.1-2 The same procedure is often advocated for assessing noninferiority of a new drug (or regimen) compared with a reference drug,1 even though in noninferiority studies emphasis is on the lower bound of the 95% CI. Indeed, the use of a 2-sided 95% CI (equivalent to a 1-sided 97.5% CI) is advocated by US and European regulatory agencies3-6 for noninferiority studies. While academic statisticians often use 1-sided 95% CIs to assess noninferiority, we chose the more conservative 2-sided approach, as suggested by these regulatory authorities.
. . . [Full Text of this Article]
Joel E. Gallant, MD, MPH
jgallant@jhmi.edu Division of Infectious Diseases Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, Md
Schlomo Staszewski, MD
Department of Internal Medicine University Hospital, J. W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Germany
Anton L. Pozniak, MD
Department of Genitourinary Medicine Chelsea and Westminster Hospital London, England
Edwin DeJesus, MD
Infectious Disease Consultants Research Initiative Altamonte Springs, Fla
Jamal M. A. H. Suleiman, MD
Instituto de Infectologia Emilio Ribas Sao Paolo, Brazil
Biao Lu, PhD;
John J. Toole, MD, PhD;
Andrew K. Cheng, MD, PhD
Gilead Sciences Foster City, Calif
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Tenofovir, Equivalence, and Noninferiority
Jean-Jacques Parienti
JAMA. 2004;292(16):1951.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|