You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 16, October 27, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •HIV/AIDS
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Tenofovir, Equivalence, and Noninferiority—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Although the terms "equivalence" and "noninferiority" are not strictly the same, we did use them interchangeably, as is commonly done.1 This study was designed as a noninferiority study with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 10% chosen as in the "Methods" section.

The 2-sided 95% CI of the difference between 2 trial arms is an appropriate and traditional method for assessing equivalence of 2 treatments.1-2 The same procedure is often advocated for assessing noninferiority of a new drug (or regimen) compared with a reference drug,1 even though in noninferiority studies emphasis is on the lower bound of the 95% CI. Indeed, the use of a 2-sided 95% CI (equivalent to a 1-sided 97.5% CI) is advocated by US and European regulatory agencies3-6 for noninferiority studies. While academic statisticians often use 1-sided 95% CIs to assess noninferiority, we chose the more conservative 2-sided approach, as suggested by these regulatory authorities.

. . . [Full Text of this Article]

Joel E. Gallant, MD, MPH
jgallant@jhmi.edu
Division of Infectious Diseases
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Md

Schlomo Staszewski, MD
Department of Internal Medicine
University Hospital, J. W. Goethe-Universität
Frankfurt, Germany

Anton L. Pozniak, MD
Department of Genitourinary Medicine
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital
London, England

Edwin DeJesus, MD
Infectious Disease Consultants Research Initiative
Altamonte Springs, Fla

Jamal M. A. H. Suleiman, MD
Instituto de Infectologia Emilio Ribas
Sao Paolo, Brazil

Biao Lu, PhD; John J. Toole, MD, PhD; Andrew K. Cheng, MD, PhD
Gilead Sciences
Foster City, Calif



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Tenofovir, Equivalence, and Noninferiority
Jean-Jacques Parienti
JAMA. 2004;292(16):1951.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.