You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 16, October 27, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Thrombolysis
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: We would like to raise a few concerns about the article by Dr Blazing and colleagues.1 First, we are interested in the proportion of patients in the unfractionated heparin group who were able to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation with the relatively low-dose anticoagulation regimen. A recent study by Raschke et al2 showed inadequate rates of anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin in large trials that compared it with low-molecular-weight heparins. Lack of differences in efficacy or safety could be attributable to underdosing of unfractionated heparins rather than to equivalence. It would also be useful to know the dose adjustment regimen for unfractionated heparin infusion used in such high-risk unstable angina patients receiving multiple antiplatelet agents.

Second, despite limited analyses from large trials3 and recent approval from the US Food and Drug Administration,4 the use of weight-based dosing of low-molecular-weight heparin without antifactor Xa levels in morbidly obese patients remains a . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Balavenkatesh Kanna, MD
bvkanna@aol.com

Puneeta Sharma, MD
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
New York, NY



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Michael Pedrini, Frank Hartig, and Christoph Pechlaner
JAMA. 2004;292(16):1952.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndrome—Reply
Kenneth W. Mahaffey, James J. Ferguson, Robert M. Califf, and for the SYNERGY Trial Investigators
JAMA. 2004;292(16):1952-1953.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndrome—Reply
Michael A. Blazing
JAMA. 2004;292(16):1953.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.