 |
 |

Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary SyndromeReply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: In response to Dr Pedrini and colleagues, we did not design our study to evaluate the important question of the duration of antithrombin therapy. Our protocol suggested a minimum duration of treatment with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin of 48 hours, but treatment duration could be shortened for those undergoing early percutaneous intervention, with heparin discontinuation permitted 12 hours after intervention. Maximal duration for study-provided medications was limited to 120 hours by protocol. Although not based on data from randomized controlled trials, this strategy is consistent with American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline recommendations.1
With respect to the points raised by Drs Kanna and Sharma, at 6 to 12 hours, 12 to 24 hours, and 24 to 48 hours, the proportions of individuals with subtherapeutic aPTT values were 39%, 43%, and 47%, respectively; with therapeutic aPTT values, 30%, 35%, and 35%; and with supratherapeutic aPTT values, 31%, 22%, . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Michael A. Blazing, MD
blazi001@mc.duke.edu Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham, NC
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Michael Pedrini, Frank Hartig, and Christoph Pechlaner
JAMA. 2004;292(16):1952.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Balavenkatesh Kanna and Puneeta Sharma
JAMA. 2004;292(16):1952.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated Heparin in Acute Coronary SyndromeReply
Kenneth W. Mahaffey, James J. Ferguson, Robert M. Califf, and for the SYNERGY Trial Investigators
JAMA. 2004;292(16):1952-1953.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|