 |
 |

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: The study by Dr Montalescot and colleagues1 compares the use of intravenous (IV) glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa inhibitors early vs at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention and concludes that early use may be preferable. A perhaps more important question is whether early IV use is superior, inferior, or equal to procedural intracoronary use of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Studies have shown improved outcomes with intracoronary use via coronary catheters2-4 and over-the-wire balloon lumens5 compared with IV use at the time of the procedure; in one study, intracoronary use had 50% fewer major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization).2 Compared with early use, the intracoronary approach has the potential benefit of knowing the anatomy prior to administration and of not giving a potentially toxic and expensive drug to patients who may not undergo percutaneous intervention but instead require cardiac surgery for which the drug is not . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Heather Horton, MD, PhD
hlhorton@geisinger.edu Geisinger Wyoming Valley Heart Hospital Wilkes-Barre, Pa
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition
JAMA. ;292():2211-2211.
FULL TEXT
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition--Reply
, , , , and
JAMA. ;292():2211-2212.
FULL TEXT
Early vs Late Administration of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis
, , , , and
JAMA. ;292():362-366.
FULL TEXT
|