You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 18, November 10, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The study by Dr Montalescot and colleagues1 compares the use of intravenous (IV) glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa inhibitors early vs at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention and concludes that early use may be preferable. A perhaps more important question is whether early IV use is superior, inferior, or equal to procedural intracoronary use of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Studies have shown improved outcomes with intracoronary use via coronary catheters2-4 and over-the-wire balloon lumens5 compared with IV use at the time of the procedure; in one study, intracoronary use had 50% fewer major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, and urgent revascularization).2 Compared with early use, the intracoronary approach has the potential benefit of knowing the anatomy prior to administration and of not giving a potentially toxic and expensive drug to patients who may not undergo percutaneous intervention but instead require cardiac surgery for which the drug is not . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Heather Horton, MD, PhD
hlhorton@geisinger.edu
Geisinger Wyoming Valley Heart Hospital
Wilkes-Barre, Pa



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition

JAMA. ;292():2211-2211.
FULL TEXT  

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition--Reply
, , , , and
JAMA. ;292():2211-2212.
FULL TEXT  

Early vs Late Administration of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis
, , , , and
JAMA. ;292():362-366.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.