You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 18, November 10, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Montalescot and colleagues analyzed 6 trials of early vs late Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors and concluded that early administration confers significant angiographic and clinical benefit.1 I have concerns about whether this interpretation is warranted.

First, it appears that studies using electrocardiographic (ST segment resolution) end points and angiographic (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow) end points were combined. It is possible that if the study by Zorman et al2 (which used electrocardiographic criteria as a primary end point) had been excluded from the analysis, the authors would not have found significant benefit.

Second, even with a combined clinical end point including death, reinfarction, rehospitalization, or revascularization, there was no significant benefit to early administration, which would speak against "favorable trends for clinical outcome when treatment is started at first medical contact."1 Finally, there was no analysis of major bleeding with early administration. This is a particular concern . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Joel Klein, MD, MA
joel.klein@earthlink.net
Department of Emergency Medicine
North Arundel Hospital
Glen Burnie, Md



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition
Heather Horton
JAMA. 2004;292(18):2211.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition—Reply
Gilles Montalescot, Maria Borentain, Laurent Payot, Jean Phillipe Collet, and Daniel Thomas
JAMA. 2004;292(18):2211-2212.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early vs Late Administration of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis
Gilles Montalescot, Maria Borentain, Laurent Payot, Jean Philippe Collet, and Daniel Thomas
JAMA. 2004;292(3):362-366.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.