You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 18, November 10, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Revascularization
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Although the objective of our study was not to evaluate the intracoronary use of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors but to test the time factor of these drugs used with the same dose regimen and the same IV route of administration, Dr Horton raises an interesting question that is of significant importance to the interventional cardiologist. Case reports and case series have shown that the intracoronary use of Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors (mainly abciximab) is feasible and certainly effective. However, it is important to acknowledge the serious limitations of these evaluations: (1) small numbers of patients compared with the larger population we reported; (2) different dose regimens used in these studies; (3) different techniques of administration either upstream of the thrombus (in the guiding catheter) or downstream after crossing the lesion; and (4) no randomized evaluation of the clinical impact of intracoronary vs IV administration.

For intracoronary use to be more . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Gilles Montalescot, MD, PhD
gilles.montalescot@psl.ap-hop-paris.fr

Maria Borentain, MD; Laurent Payot, MD; Jean Phillipe Collet, MD, PhD; Daniel Thomas, MD
Institut de Cardiologie
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière
Paris, France



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition
Heather Horton
JAMA. 2004;292(18):2211.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition
Joel Klein
JAMA. 2004;292(18):2211.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Early vs Late Administration of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis
Gilles Montalescot, Maria Borentain, Laurent Payot, Jean Philippe Collet, and Daniel Thomas
JAMA. 2004;292(3):362-366.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.