You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 19, November 17, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Medical News & Perspectives
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics
 •Neonatology and Infant Care
 •Genetics
 •Genetic Counseling/ Testing/ Therapy
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Expanded Newborn Genetic Testing Urged

Tracy Hampton, PhD

JAMA. 2004;292:2325-2326.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Advances in diagnostic technology and medical treatment for inherited disorders have prompted calls to expand the number of these conditions screened at birth. A task force commissioned by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) is recommending that all states test newborns for 29 genetic disorders that are detectable through blood analysis.

This recommendation comes following a 3-year study by the American College of Medical Genetics, in Bethesda, Md. The group said publication of the study’s findings was imminent, and health officials hope that public comment will help refine the official recommendations made by the DHHS.


Experts are now advising all states to screen newborns for 29 inherited disorders that are detectable through blood analysis. Photo credit: Schleicher & Schuell BioScience/NY State Dept of Health

Michael Watson, PhD, executive director of the American College of Medical Genetics, the study’s lead author, explained that certain criteria were . . . [Full Text of this Article]

STATE-BASED STANDARDS



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

From a Genetic Predisposition to an Interactive Predisposition: Rethinking the Ethical Implications of Screening for Gene-Environment Interactions
Tabery
J Med Philos 2009;0:jhn039v1-jhn039.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.