 |
 |

On-Pump vs Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingReply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: In response to Mr Patel, we discussed the conduct of perfusion in considerable detail in the preliminary report from this study,1 which was cited extensively in our current article. We do agree, however, that cardiopulmonary bypass techniques and technologies have recently been the subject of significant innovation, perhaps as a response to the perceived "threat" of off-pump CABG. Low-prime circuits, retrograde autologous priming, coated tubing, and dilutional ultrafiltration have recently demonstrated promise and are techniques and technologies we and others currently use. However, during enrollment for our trial, mini-primed circuits were in an early phase of development. Perfusion techniques in our trial were state of the art at the time and were compared with contemporary techniques for off-pump CABG.
Techniques and technologies for off-pump CABG have also improved since we began our trial. New suction-based cardiac positioning devices and improved coronary stabilizers now provide improved visualization and stabilization . . . [Full Text of this Article]
John D. Puskas, MD, MSc
john_puskas@emoryhealthcare.org Department of Surgery (Cardiothoracic)
Candace Palmer-Steele, CCP
Perfusion Services Emory Crawford Long Hospital Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta, Ga
RELATED ARTICLES
On-Pump vs Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Kirti Patel
JAMA. 2004;292(2):169.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Off-Pump vs Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Early and 1-Year Graft Patency, Cost, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes: A Randomized Trial
John D. Puskas, Willis H. Williams, Elizabeth M. Mahoney, Philip R. Huber, Peter C. Block, Peggy G. Duke, James R. Staples, Katherine E. Glas, J. Jeffrey Marshall, Mark E. Leimbach, Susan A. McCall, Rebecca J. Petersen, Dianne E. Bailey, William S. Weintraub, and Robert A. Guyton
JAMA. 2004;291(15):1841-1849.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|