 |
|
Fee-for-Service vs Managed Care Medicine
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
To the Editor: From the results of their national survey, Dr Landon and colleagues1 reported that participants in Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) plans were more satisfied with their access to care and quality of services, but that recipients of Medicare managed care (MMC) received more immunizations and repoted fewer difficulties with paperwork. Although the authors performed case-mix adjustment based on age, education, and health status, I am puzzled that the authors did not assess pharmaceutical use.
All of the MMC programs I have worked with have had some drug coverage included—although, at about the time of the survey, the premium charged by those plans was increasing steeply due to cost increases. It is possible that patients taking multiple medications would be disproportionately likely to choose a managed care plan covering prescription drugs as opposed to standard Medicare with no such coverage. Increasing premiums could be partially responsible for the the lower . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Roger K. Howe, MD, MMM
rogerkhowe@cs.com
Little Rock, Ark
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Fee-for-Service vs Managed Care Medicine—Reply
Bruce E. Landon, Alan M. Zaslavsky, and Paul D. Cleary
JAMA. 2004;292(2):170.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Comparison of Performance of Traditional Medicare vs Medicare Managed Care
Bruce E. Landon, Alan M. Zaslavsky, Shulamit L. Bernard, Matthew J. Cioffi, and Paul D. Cleary
JAMA. 2004;291(14):1744-1752.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
