Accessibility and Accuracy of Web Page References in 5 Major Medical Journals
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
To the Editor: Online access to information has changed the scope of medical research and data collection. Information formerly available only through many hours with Index Medicus and extensive correspondence is now easily obtained by most researchers. With this method of data collection becoming more widespread, Web site references are becoming more prevalent in leading medical journals.1 In 1984, prior to the proliferation of Internet references, de Lacey et al2 examined a random sample of citations from 6 medical journals and found an 8% major and a 24% overall error rate in citations referencing printed works. Twenty years later we investigated the accessibility and accuracy of Internet references for studies in 5 major medical journals 3 months after their publication.
Methods
In April 2004, we examined all original research papers that had appeared in the Annals of Internal Medicine, BMJ, JAMA, The Lancet, and the New England . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Renée Crichlow, MD
reneec4@u.washington.edu
Stefanie Davies
University of Washington
Montana Family Medicine Residency Program
Billings
Nicole Winbush, MD
Saint Vincent Healthcare
Billings
RELATED LETTERS
Permanence of Web Page References
Tamilarasu Kadhiravan
JAMA. 2005;293(12):1450.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Permanence of Web Page References—Reply
Renée Crichlow and Nicole Winbush
JAMA. 2005;293(12):1450.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
The Prevalence and Inaccessibility of Internet References in the Biomedical Literature at the Time of Publication
Aronsky et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14:232-234.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Scholarship Erosion
Badgett et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:77-77.
FULL TEXT
Permanence of Web Page References
Kadhiravan
JAMA 2005;293:1450-1450.
FULL TEXT
|
