You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 4, July 28, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Oncology
 •Colon Cancer
 •Radiologic Imaging, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Virtual Colonoscopy

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Cotton and colleagues1 reported that computed tomographic colonography (CTC), also known as virtual colonoscopy, had much lower sensitivity for detecting colonic neoplasms than did conventional colonoscopy. We have several concerns about the authors' methods.

First, their technology appears to be outdated. Some of the 9 institutions in the study used thick CT slice collimation (5 mm). This contrasts the current practice standard of 3 mm or less. Thicker slices may degrade anatomic detail, especially of small polyps. Furthermore, the authors did not describe their visualization software. Since their study was conducted between April 17, 2000, and October 3, 2001, the software was likely outdated compared with that currently available.

Second, quality control was unclear. The authors did not describe the quality of colon preparation or air distension, which are important elements in the overall success of CTC.

Third, it appears that some readers were inexperienced. Several . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Joseph Ferrucci, MD
joseph.ferrucci@BMC.org
Boston University Medical Center
For the Working Group on Virtual Colonoscopy

Matthew Barish, MD
Boston, Mass

Richard Choi, MD
Washington, DC

Abraham Dachman, MD
Chicago, Ill

Helen Fenlon, MD
Dublin, Ireland

Seth Glick, MD
Philadelphia, Pa

Andrea Laghi, MD
Rome, Italy

Michael Macari, MD
New York, NY

Martina Morrin, MD
Boston, Mass

Erik Paulson, MD
Durham, NC

Perry J. Pickhardt, MD
Madison, Wis

Jorge Soto, MD
Boston, Mass

Judy Yee, MD
San Francisco, Calif

Michael Zalis, MD
Boston, Mass



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

CT Colonography: A Systematic Review of Standard of Reporting for Studies of Computer-aided Detection
Robinson et al.
Radiology 2008;246:426-433.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Directed Training on Reader Performance for CT Colonography: Multicenter Study
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal
Radiology 2007;242:152-161.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reader Training in CT Colonography: How Much Is Enough?
Soto et al.
Radiology 2005;237:26-27.
FULL TEXT  

Colonoscopy: Virtual and Optical--Another Look, Another View
Ferrucci
Radiology 2005;235:13-16.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.