 |
 |

Virtual Colonoscopy
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: The results of studies by Dr Cotton and colleagues1 may reflect the fact that a proportion of radiologists were not qualified to interpret CTC.2 The authors state that participating radiologists merely had to have performed 10 procedures and that some centers recruited as few as 10 patients. Furthermore, there was no formal feedback to the participating radiologists, inferring that the analysis of sequential accrual blocks was meaningless. The opportunity to determine any learning curve was lost.1 Unfortunately, the proportion of relatively inexperienced radiologists cannot be determined from the article. In contrast, while the experience of the colonoscopists is also undefined, the fact that their completion rate was 98.5% indicates that they were very capable indeed. In comparison, a recent UK audit of 9223 procedures found an adjusted cecal intubation rate of only 56.9%.3
The authors stated that they wished to assess CTC in routine practice. We wonder . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Steve Halligan, MD, FRCP, FRCR
s.halligan@imperial.ac.uk
Stuart Taylor, MD, MRCP, FRCR;
David Burling, MRCP, FRCR
Intestinal Imaging Centre St Mark's Hospital London, England
RELATED ARTICLES
Virtual Colonoscopy
Perry J. Pickhardt
JAMA. 2004;292(4):431.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Virtual Colonoscopy
Joseph Ferrucci, Matthew Barish, Richard Choi, Abraham Dachman, Helen Fenlon, Seth Glick, Andrea Laghi, Michael Macari, Martina Morrin, Erik Paulson, Perry J. Pickhardt, Jorge Soto, Judy Yee, and Michael Zalis
JAMA. 2004;292(4):431-432.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Virtual Colonoscopy
Ronald M. Summers, Ingmar Bitter, and Nicholas Petrick
JAMA. 2004;292(4):432-433.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Virtual ColonoscopyReply
Peter B. Cotton, Douglas Rex, David J. Vining, and Benoit Pineau
JAMA. 2004;292(4):433.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Computed Tomographic Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy): A Multicenter Comparison With Standard Colonoscopy for Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia
Peter B. Cotton, Valerie L. Durkalski, Benoit C. Pineau, Yuko Y. Palesch, Patrick D. Mauldin, Brenda Hoffman, David J. Vining, William C. Small, John Affronti, Douglas Rex, Kenyon K. Kopecky, Susan Ackerman, J. Steven Burdick, Cecelia Brewington, Mary A. Turner, Alvin Zfass, Andrew R. Wright, Revathy B. Iyer, Patrick Lynch, Michael V. Sivak, and Harold Butler
JAMA. 2004;291(14):1713-1719.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
CT Colonography: A Systematic Review of Standard of Reporting for Studies of Computer-aided Detection
Robinson et al.
Radiology 2008;246:426-433.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effect of Directed Training on Reader Performance for CT Colonography: Multicenter Study
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal
Radiology 2007;242:152-161.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|