You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 292 No. 4, July 28, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Oncology
 •Colon Cancer
 •Radiologic Imaging, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Virtual Colonoscopy

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: We have a number of concerns about the study by Dr Cotton and colleagues,1 including the thickness of the CT slices, the lack of oral contrast, the format for image interpretation, and variable numbers of patients across institutions. In our experience, collimation that exceeds 3 mm substantially reduces image quality and lesion conspicuity. Similarly, other studies suggest that oral contrast should be routinely administered.2-3 The selection of slice-by-slice viewing for primary CTC interpretation over an appropriate 3-dimensional volume rendering or fly-through viewing system also may have made CTC less sensitive in identifying lesions.4 Finally, a single institution with experienced readers contributed 30% of the cases. In the other institutions, the readers' lack of experience in CTC may be another reason why the apparent sensitivity was lower in these institutions.

The authors did not report several additional features such as the quality of bowel preparation, extent of colonic . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Ronald M. Summers, MD, PhD
rms@nih.gov

Ingmar Bitter, PhD
Department of Radiology
National Institutes of Health
Bethesda, Md

Nicholas Petrick, PhD
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
US Food and Drug Administration
Rockville, Md


RELATED ARTICLES

Virtual Colonoscopy
Perry J. Pickhardt
JAMA. 2004;292(4):431.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Virtual Colonoscopy
Joseph Ferrucci, Matthew Barish, Richard Choi, Abraham Dachman, Helen Fenlon, Seth Glick, Andrea Laghi, Michael Macari, Martina Morrin, Erik Paulson, Perry J. Pickhardt, Jorge Soto, Judy Yee, and Michael Zalis
JAMA. 2004;292(4):431-432.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Virtual Colonoscopy
Steve Halligan, Stuart Taylor, and David Burling
JAMA. 2004;292(4):432.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Virtual Colonoscopy—Reply
Peter B. Cotton, Douglas Rex, David J. Vining, and Benoit Pineau
JAMA. 2004;292(4):433.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computed Tomographic Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy): A Multicenter Comparison With Standard Colonoscopy for Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia
Peter B. Cotton, Valerie L. Durkalski, Benoit C. Pineau, Yuko Y. Palesch, Patrick D. Mauldin, Brenda Hoffman, David J. Vining, William C. Small, John Affronti, Douglas Rex, Kenyon K. Kopecky, Susan Ackerman, J. Steven Burdick, Cecelia Brewington, Mary A. Turner, Alvin Zfass, Andrew R. Wright, Revathy B. Iyer, Patrick Lynch, Michael V. Sivak, and Harold Butler
JAMA. 2004;291(14):1713-1719.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reader Training in CT Colonography: How Much Is Enough?
Soto et al.
Radiology 2005;237:26-27.
FULL TEXT  

Colonoscopy: Virtual and Optical--Another Look, Another View
Ferrucci
Radiology 2005;235:13-16.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.