 |
 |

Estrogen Plus Progestin and Risk of Venous Thrombosis
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr Cushman and colleagues1 presented data from the Womens Health Initiative (WHI) Estrogen Plus Progestin (E + P) trial and concluded that this combination was associated with increased risk for venous thromboembolism. The authors note that these results apply to the combination of oral conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) with medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and are not necessarily relevant to other types of hormone therapy; they describe the association with transdermal estrogen therapy as controversial.
The Estrogen and Thromboembolism Risk (ESTHER) study showed that oral but not transdermal estrogen was associated with venous thromboembolism risk.2 Three other studies reported estimates of venous thromboembolism risk among users of transdermal estrogen,3 but the results were based on few cases with transdermal estrogen use, and each study was inconclusive. Biological data support the difference in venous thromboembolism risk between oral and transdermal estrogen because randomized short-term trials have shown that oral but . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Pierre-Yves Scarabin, MD
scarabin@vjf.inserm.fr
Emmanuel Oger, MD;
Tabassome Simon, MD;
Geneviève Plu-Bureau, MD
Cardiovascular Epidemiology Inserm Paris, France
RELATED ARTICLES
Estrogen Plus Progestin and Risk of Venous Thrombosis
Richard E. Blackwell
JAMA. 2005;293(11):1322.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Estrogen Plus Progestin and Risk of Venous ThrombosisReply
Mary Cushman, Ross Prentice, Bruce M. Psaty, Frits R. Rosendaal, and for the WHI Investigators
JAMA. 2005;293(11):1322-1323.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Estrogen Plus Progestin and Risk of Venous Thrombosis
Mary Cushman, Lewis H. Kuller, Ross Prentice, Rebecca J. Rodabough, Bruce M. Psaty, Randall S. Stafford, Steven Sidney, Frits R. Rosendaal, and for the Womens Health Initiative Investigators
JAMA. 2004;292(13):1573-1580.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|