 |
 |

Permanence of Web Page References
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: The Research Letter by Dr Crichlow and colleagues1 addresses an important problem faced by readers of medical literature: elusive Web-based references. In response to this challenge, the US National Library of Medicine (NLM) has recently begun to assign permanence levels to its Web-based documents2 and to make these ratings available to users. Documents within this system are assigned 1 of the following ratings: permanent-unchanging content, permanent-stable content, permanent-dynamic content, or permanence not guaranteed. In the case of the first 3 (ie, permanence-guaranteed documents), the uniform resource locator (URL) link remains unchanged even if the contents are changed in the future, as may occur with documents having dynamic or stable content. This may serve as an example for other online sources of medical information. Journals may decide to stipulate that only "permanence-guaranteed" Web pages be cited as references and a brief description of the permanence level may . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Tamilarasu Kadhiravan, MD
kadhiravant@yahoo.co.in Department of Medicine All India Institute of Medical Sciences Ansari Nagar New Delhi, India
RELATED LETTER
Accessibility and Accuracy of Web Page References in 5 Major Medical Journals
Renée Crichlow, Stefanie Davies, and Nicole Winbush
JAMA. 2004;292(22):2723-2724.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
Permanence of Web Page ReferencesReply
Renée Crichlow and Nicole Winbush
JAMA. 2005;293(12):1450.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|