This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Psychiatry  • Alert me on articles by topic

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: First and foremost, I have no reason to believe that Dr Szasz is anti-Semitic and every reason to believe that Karl Popper was not, and I regret any implication to the contrary. Rather, I was concerned that Popper’s letter, otherwise uncontextualized in the vituperative milieu of this book, could be read as an allusion to the anti-Semitism that has occasionally but notoriously lurked in criticisms of psychiatry, from both within and without.¹

I was not surprised that there is disagreement between Szasz and his critics (a lack of which would have made for dull reading, and this book is certainly not dull). I was, however, startled by the vehemence of the invective and the degree to which many, but not all, of the parties refused this opportunity to think through and beyond various points of impasse. After all, the "continuing refusal of psychiatry to understand the completeness of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Schuyler W. Henderson, MD
HendersS@childpsych.columbia.edu
Columbia University
New York, NY

RELATED ARTICLES

Szasz Under Fire
Keith Hoeller
JAMA. 2005;293(16):1978.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Szasz Under Fire: The Psychiatric Abolitionist Faces His Critics
Schuyler W. Henderson
JAMA. 2005;293(2):240-241.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT