You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 293 No. 19, May 18, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Medical News & Perspectives
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Women's Health
 •Menopause
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

NIH Panel Tries to Clear Confusion, Spur Research on Managing Menopause

Rebecca Voelker

JAMA. 2005;293:2329-2331.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Nearly 3 years after findings from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) threw a major wrench into menopausal hormone use, a panel convened by the National Institutes of Health has taken a first step toward determining safe, effective approaches in managing symptoms of menopause.

Panel chair Carol Mangione, MD, said confusion has flooded discussions of managing menopausal symptoms since the WHI findings showed that estrogen only and estrogen plus progestin therapy can increase the risk of coronary heart disease, thromboembolism, stroke, and breast cancer.

"The information out there has not been sufficient for patients to understand the implications of [the WHI] and how the results should apply to their personal decisions," said Mangione, a professor of medicine in the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles.


Many women stopped using hormones after the WHI findings came out, Mangione noted, even though the landmark study . . . [Full Text of this Article]

NORMAL PART OF LIFE



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Quality or Quantity in the Management of Hereditary Ovarian Cancer Risk: Is It Really a Trade-Off?
Masciari and Garber
JCO 2005;23:6817-6819.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.