This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (8)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Radiologic Imaging  • Computed Tomography  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Hype or New Paradigm?

Mario J. Garcia, MD

JAMA. 2005;293:2531-2533.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

When Sones inadvertently performed the first coronary angiogram in 1958,¹ he could not anticipate the profound future implications of that event. Four years later, when he reported his experience with more than 1000 procedures,² the technique was still considered experimental and was dismissed by many leading authorities in cardiovascular medicine. Yet, the introduction of coronary angiography started a new era, leading to the rapid development of coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous revascularization for the routine management of ischemic heart disease. Four decades later, more than 2 million angiographic procedures are performed annually in the United States alone.³ Although invasive coronary angiography clearly has led to improved outcomes, it also has contributed to greater expenses in health care cost,³ limiting its potential to become more widely available. This has led to a growing interest in the scientific community in the development of less expensive, noninvasive . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Cardiovascular Imaging Section, Departments of Cardiology and Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Multislice Computed Tomography
Martin H. K. Hoffmann, Heshui Shi, Bernd L. Schmitz, Florian T. Schmid, Michael Lieberknecht, Ralph Schulze, Bernd Ludwig, Ulf Kroschel, Norbert Jahnke, Winfried Haerer, Hans-Juergen Brambs, and Andrik J. Aschoff
JAMA. 2005;293(20):2471-2478.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Adoption And Spread Of New Imaging Technology: A Case Study
Ladapo et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:w1122-w1132.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
Mowatt et al.
Heart 2008;94:1386-1393.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Noninvasive Coronary Artery Imaging: Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young
Bluemke et al.
Circulation 2008;118:586-606.
FULL TEXT  

Cardiac CT: Indications and Limitations
Prat-Gonzalez et al.
J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 2008;36:18-24.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reply
Achenbach and Daniel
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:891-892.
FULL TEXT  

Cardiac CT: Wave of the Future
JWatch Emergency Med. 2005;2005:4-4.
FULL TEXT  

Accuracy of Noninvasive Coronary Angiography
JWatch Gastroenterology 2005;2005:9-9.
FULL TEXT  

Multislice CT vs. Invasive Angiography
Journal Watch Cardiology 2005;2005:1-1.
FULL TEXT  

Accuracy of Noninvasive Coronary Angiography
JWatch General 2005;2005:3-3.
FULL TEXT  

To Cath or Not to Cath: That Is No Longer the Question
Bhatt
JAMA 2005;293:2935-2937.
FULL TEXT