You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 293 No. 21, June 1, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Health Policy
 •Law and Medicine
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Tort Reform and the Patient Safety Movement

Seeking Common Ground

Peter P. Budetti, MD, JD

JAMA. 2005;293:2660-2662.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

According to Sage,1 "doctors hate malpractice suits . . . passionately and continuously. . . . Eliminating malpractice suits takes precedence over every other political objective. . . . No contradictory belief, however well-reasoned, empirically based, or sincerely held, succeeds in crowding out antipathy toward malpractice from physicians’ minds. Not the large number of patients who die unnecessarily each year from medical errors; not the desirability of allowing patients to sue [health maintenance organizations] HMOs for improper care."

Sage’s vivid depiction of the profession’s bilious antagonism toward medical malpractice provides important context for drawing lessons from 2 articles in this issue of JAMA that explore the behavior of physicians in specialties that pay the highest malpractice insurance premiums and have the greatest risk of being sued. The study by Studdert et al2 reveals the extraordinary extent to which physicians report going against their own clinical judgment in the hope of minimizing their malpractice exposure. The study . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Department of Health Administration and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.


RELATED ARTICLES

Defensive Medicine Among High-Risk Specialist Physicians in a Volatile Malpractice Environment
David M. Studdert, Michelle M. Mello, William M. Sage, Catherine M. DesRoches, Jordon Peugh, Kinga Zapert, and Troyen A. Brennan
JAMA. 2005;293(21):2609-2617.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Malpractice Reforms on the Supply of Physician Services
Daniel P. Kessler, William M. Sage, and David J. Becker
JAMA. 2005;293(21):2618-2625.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Impact Of State Tort Reforms On Physician Malpractice Payments
Waters et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:500-509.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Patient's Right to Safety -- Improving the Quality of Care through Litigation against Hospitals.
Annas
NEJM 2006;354:2063-2066.
FULL TEXT  

Improving Relations Between Attorneys and Physicians
Jacobson and Bloche
JAMA 2005;294:2083-2085.
FULL TEXT  

Defensive Medicine Is Prevalent in High-Risk Disciplines
JWatch Emergency Med. 2005;2005:8-8.
FULL TEXT  

Medical Errors
Holder
ASH Education Book 2005;2005:503-506.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.