You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 293 No. 22, June 8, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Treatment Adherence
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their Editorial,1 Drs Sanders and Ewy raise important questions about the scientific consensus process used by the American Heart Association (AHA) and International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) in determining guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). We agree that actual resuscitation performance in and out of the hospital is often suboptimal2-4 and that more real-world resuscitation research is needed to guide recommendations. We also agree that improving the likelihood of bystander response and quality of CPR are essential to improve outcomes.

The current ILCOR and AHA resuscitation evidence evaluation process includes multiple steps to ensure that recommendations are scientifically based. For the 2005 consensus process, 5 international expert panels selected topics for review. Selection was based on scientific developments and level of controversy. For each topic, 1 or more experts performed a systematic structured review, graded scientific evidence, and drafted recommendations. Worksheets were critiqued by 2 independent . . . [Full Text of this Article]

John E. Billi, MD
jbilli@umich.edu
Department of Internal Medicine
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor

William Montgomery, MD
University of Hawaii
Honolulu

Jerry Nolan, MD
Royal United Hospital
Bath, England

Vinay Nadkarni, MD
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pa


RELATED ARTICLES

Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation—Reply
Arthur B. Sanders and Gordon A. Ewy
JAMA. 2005;293(22):2713-2714.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Lars Wik, Jo Kramer-Johansen, Helge Myklebust, Hallstein Sørebø, Leif Svensson, Bob Fellows, and Petter Andreas Steen
JAMA. 2005;293(3):299-304.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Benjamin S. Abella, Jason P. Alvarado, Helge Myklebust, Dana P. Edelson, Anne Barry, Nicholas O’Hearn, Terry L. Vanden Hoek, and Lance B. Becker
JAMA. 2005;293(3):305-310.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Real World: When Will the Guidelines Get the Message?
Arthur B. Sanders and Gordon A. Ewy
JAMA. 2005;293(3):363-365.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.