You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 293 No. 23, June 15, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Thrombolysis
 •Neurology
 •Cerebrovascular Disease
 •Stroke
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Arrhythmias
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cost-effectiveness of Ximelagatran for Stroke Prevention

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: We would like to raise concerns about a possible bias in the cost-effectiveness analysis by Drs O’Brien and Gage.1 To calculate quality-adjusted survival, the authors used results of a previous survey of 83 patients with atrial fibrillation,2 which estimated the mean utility of warfarin therapy to be 0.987 and the mean utility of aspirin therapy to be 0.998. We believe that the utility of warfarin therapy may be overestimated.

Gage et al noted in the previous study2 that 11 of 70 patients rated the utility of warfarin therapy so low that their quality-adjusted life expectancy would be greater with aspirin, and there was great interpatient variability. In the present study, sensitivity analyses were conducted across a range of only 0.953 to 1.0 for warfarin, while in the cited study these utilities varied from 0.5 to 1.0. Moreover, in another decision analysis of anticoagulant therapy for prevention . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Christine Perret-Guillaume, MD
c.perret-guillaume@chu-nancy.fr
Department of Internal Medicine
Unit of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nancy
Nancy, France

Denis Wahl, MD, PhD
INSERM Unite 734
Université Poincaré Nancy I
Nancy, France



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Cost-effectiveness of Ximelagatran for Stroke Prevention--Reply
and
JAMA. ;293():2861-2861.
FULL TEXT  

Costs and Effectiveness of Ximelagatran for Stroke Prophylaxis in Chronic Atrial Fibrillation
and
JAMA. ;293():699-706.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.