You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 293 No. 5, February 2, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Cerebrovascular Disease
 •Computed Tomography
 •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Comparison of MRI and CT for Detection of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their study comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) for detection of acute intracerebral hemorrhage in patients presenting with acute stroke symptoms,1 Dr Kidwell and colleagues concluded that the 2 methods have equivalent accuracy. Although the reported level of raw agreement of 96% was very high, we believe that an alternate statistical approach would have been more appropriate and would have resulted in a more conservative level of agreement.

Given that in the final study design neither modality was considered to be a criterion standard, a {kappa} statistic should have been used to summarize the findings rather than a McNemar test for proportions. Even though the level of raw agreement was very high, because the prevalence for detecting acute hemorrhage was low (14.5%), agreement between MRI and CT could have occurred 75.2% of the time by chance alone. Correcting for this chance agreement, the level . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Michael Eliasziw, PhD
eliasziw@ucalgary.ca
Departments of Community Health Sciences  and Clinical Neurosciences

Leslie Paddock-Eliasziw, RN
Department of Pathology
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta


RELATED ARTICLES

Comparison of MRI and CT for Detection of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Michael Eliasziw and Leslie Paddock-Eliasziw
JAMA. 2005;293(5):550.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of MRI and CT for Detection of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage—Reply
Chelsea S. Kidwell, Julio Chalela, Jeffrey L. Saver, Michael D. Hill, Andrew Demchuk, John Butman, and Steven Warach
JAMA. 2005;293(5):550-551.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of MRI and CT for Detection of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Chelsea S. Kidwell, Julio A. Chalela, Jeffrey L. Saver, Sidney Starkman, Michael D. Hill, Andrew M. Demchuk, John A. Butman, Nicholas Patronas, Jeffry R. Alger, Lawrence L. Latour, Marie L. Luby, Alison E. Baird, Megan C. Leary, Margaret Tremwel, Bruce Ovbiagele, Andre Fredieu, Shuichi Suzuki, J. Pablo Villablanca, Stephen Davis, Billy Dunn, Jason W. Todd, Mustapha A. Ezzeddine, Joseph Haymore, John K. Lynch, Lisa Davis, and Steven Warach
JAMA. 2004;292(15):1823-1830.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.