You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 293 No. 6, February 9, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Education
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Theme Issue on Medical Education

Call for Papers

Robert M. Golub, MD

JAMA. 2005;293:742.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

doc·tor n [ . . . fr. L, teacher, fr. docere to teach . . . ]

Even if unaware of these Latin roots, all doctors are teachers. Some physicians may carry that literal title during interactions with students, residents, fellows, and peers. However, all physicians are teachers for their patients, and much of the success of that relationship depends on effective teaching. Given the ubiquity of this role, it is ironic that few physicians are formally trained to be educators. Moreover, in a discipline that generally requires that research of the highest standard be used to guide professional activities, the evidence base for medical education remains dominated by anecdote, limited observational studies, and intermediate outcomes.1-3

There are well-recognized barriers to improving research in medical education,2 including methodological challenges, curricular constraints, and financial pressures combined with limited funding. Study designs can parallel those used in clinical science,1 but there are unique problems in the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Dr Golub is Senior Editor, JAMA (robert_golub@jama-archives.org).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Costs and Funding for Published Medical Education Research
Reed et al.
JAMA 2005;294:1052-1057.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical Education 2005: From Allegory to Bull Moose
Golub
JAMA 2005;294:1108-1110.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.