This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship  • Alert me on articles by topic

Catherine D. DeAngelis, MD, MPH; Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD

JAMA. 2005;293:1123.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In this issue of JAMA, we are publishing, with our sincere thanks, the names of the peer reviewers who completed manuscript reviews for JAMA in 2004.¹ We acknowledge and appreciate the indispensable contributions of these dedicated reviewers—who represent virtually every field of medical science—for their thoughtful, rigorous critiques and their essential role in helping maintain and enhance the quality and scientific integrity of articles published in JAMA.

We also extend our sincere thanks to the physician-scientists, medical researchers, clinical investigators, and many other authors who submitted manuscripts for consideration for publication in JAMA. We are grateful that authors of medical research reports and other manuscripts entrust us with their important work. We have and always will strive to ensure that the evaluation of each manuscript is objective and as efficient as possible.

The quality of the papers submitted . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Dr DeAngelis is Editor-in-Chief and Dr Fontanarosa is Executive Deputy Editor, JAMA.

RELATED ARTICLE

JAMA Peer Reviewers in 2004
JAMA. 2005;293(9):1125-1138.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Instructions for Authors
JAMA 2006;295:103-111.
FULL TEXT  

Instructions for Authors
JAMA 2005;294:119-127.
FULL TEXT  

Instructions for Authors
JAMA 2005;293:1788-1796.
FULL TEXT