 |
|
To JAMA Peer Reviewers and Authors—Thank You
Catherine D. DeAngelis, MD, MPH;
Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD
JAMA. 2005;293:1123.
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
In this issue of JAMA, we are publishing, with our sincere thanks, the names of the peer reviewers who completed manuscript reviews for JAMA in 2004.1 We acknowledge and appreciate the indispensable contributions of these dedicated reviewers—who represent virtually every field of medical science—for their thoughtful, rigorous critiques and their essential role in helping maintain and enhance the quality and scientific integrity of articles published in JAMA.
We also extend our sincere thanks to the physician-scientists, medical researchers, clinical investigators, and many other authors who submitted manuscripts for consideration for publication in JAMA. We are grateful that authors of medical research reports and other manuscripts entrust us with their important work. We have and always will strive to ensure that the evaluation of each manuscript is objective and as efficient as possible.
The quality of the papers submitted . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Author Affiliations: Dr DeAngelis is Editor-in-Chief and Dr Fontanarosa is Executive Deputy Editor, JAMA.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
JAMA Peer Reviewers in 2004
JAMA. 2005;293(9):1125-1138.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Instructions for Authors
JAMA 2006;295:103-111.
FULL TEXT
Instructions for Authors
JAMA 2005;294:119-127.
FULL TEXT
Instructions for Authors
JAMA 2005;293:1788-1796.
FULL TEXT
|
