This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Statistics and Research Methods  • Hematology/ Hematologic Malignancies  • Leukemias/ Lymphomas  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: We agree with Drs Zahm and Fraumeni that the meta-analysis process is limited by the information provided in the individual studies. If data are available in only 1 or 2 studies, it may be difficult to include them in a meta-analysis. This is why we did not claim that our meta-analysis was conclusive about the potential carcinogenic effect of hair dyes and called for further studies.

Zahm and Fraumeni mention 5 individual ORs for dark colored dyes, but they provide the corresponding 95% CI only for Zhang et al (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.0-4.0).¹ The 95% CI corresponding to the OR of 2.1 from the study by Altekruse et al² is 0.7 to 6.7 and is based on only 3 exposed cases. The OR for black hair coloring in the study by Zahm et al³ is 4.1, but its 95% CI is 0.9 to 18.8 (representing 4 cases), . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Bahi Takkouche, MD, PhD
mrbahi@usc.es

Agustín Montes-Martínez, MD, PhD
Department of Preventive Medicine
University of Santiago de Compostela
Santiago de Compostela, Spain

Mahyar Etminan, PharmD, MSc(Epid)
Division of Clinical Epidemiology
Royal Victoria Hospital
Montreal, Quebec

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Hair Dye Use and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Shelia Hoar Zahm and Joseph F. Fraumeni, Jr
JAMA. 2005;294(10):1205.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Personal Use of Hair Dyes and Risk of Cancer: A Meta-analysis
Bahi Takkouche, Mahyar Etminan, and Agustín Montes-Martínez
JAMA. 2005;293(20):2516-2525.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT