You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 10, September 14, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The RADAR Project and the FDA

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) project described in the Special Communication by Dr Bennett and colleagues1 shows how a focused research team can aid postmarketing surveillance by actively investigating potential adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Operating out of a National Cancer Institute–designated comprehensive cancer center, the RADAR project is well-configured to address cancer and hematopoietic-related ADRs, an important category of adverse events often associated with drug exposures. Other organ-based specialists, such as hepatologists involved with the Drug Induced Liver Injury Network,2 similarly offer insights into drug-related illnesses of patients in their care.

The workup of suspect adverse events described for the RADAR project is very similar to the recent description by a public advisory committee of the activities of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety evaluators.3 Safety review in the FDA is also highly systematic and involves primary, secondary, and tertiary clinical review . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Anne E. Trontell, MD, MPH
trontella@cder.fda.gov
Office of Drug Safety
FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
Rockville, Md



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

The RADAR Project and the FDA—Reply
Charles L. Bennett, Jonathan R. Nebeker, and Dennis W. Raisch
JAMA. 2005;294(10):1206-1207.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) Project
Charles L. Bennett, Jonathan R. Nebeker, E. Allison Lyons, Matthew H. Samore, Marc D. Feldman, June M. McKoy, Kenneth R. Carson, Steven M. Belknap, Steven M. Trifilio, Glen T. Schumock, Paul R. Yarnold, Charles J. Davidson, Andrew M. Evens, Timothy M. Kuzel, Jorge P. Parada, Denis Cournoyer, Dennis P. West, Oliver Sartor, Martin S. Tallman, and Dennis W. Raisch
JAMA. 2005;293(17):2131-2140.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evaluation of Serious Adverse Drug Reactions: A Proactive Pharmacovigilance Program (RADAR) vs Safety Activities Conducted by the Food and Drug Administration and Pharmaceutical Manufacturers
Bennett et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1041-1049.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.