You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 10, September 14, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Men's Health
 •Prostate Disease
 •Oncology
 •Prostate Cancer
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Localized Prostate Cancer and DNA Ploidy—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: The extraordinary variability in prostate cancer clinical outcomes poses a significant challenge to anyone counseling patients about treatment for clinically localized disease. Clinicians have relied on stage and grade to quantify prognosis accurately. Gleason and Mellinger and members of the Veterans Administration Cooperative Urological Research Group developed a low-power scoring system that standardized prostate cancer readings worldwide.1 Unfortunately, as indicated by Dr Koss, the system is inherently subjective and therefore prone to differing interpretations. In its place, Dr Koss suggests an analysis of DNA content.

Although we agree with Dr Koss’ criticism, we do not believe that DNA ploidy analysis provides any additional independent prognostic information. Studies have shown that ploidy in prostate cancer may vary from area to area within the carcinoma specimen.2 For this reason, researchers have explored various molecular markers in an attempt to identify one or several markers that can accurately predict the clinical . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Peter C. Albertsen, MD, MS
albertsen@nso.uchc.edu
University of Connecticut Health Center
Farmington

James A. Hanley, PhD
McGill University
Montreal, Quebec

Judith Fine, BA
University of Connecticut
Farmington



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

20-Year Outcomes Following Conservative Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
, , and
JAMA. ;293():2095-2101.
FULL TEXT  

Localized Prostate Cancer and DNA Ploidy

JAMA. ;294():1207-1207.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.