You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 12, September 28, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Computed Tomography
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Clinical Decision Instruments for CT Scanning in Minor Head Injury

Micelle J. Haydel, MD

JAMA. 2005;294:1551-1553.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Approximately 1 million patients with minor head injury are evaluated in US emergency departments and primary care offices annually.1-2 Less than 10% of patients with a normal level of consciousness after minor head trauma have intracranial injury and less than 1% require neurosurgical intervention.3-5 The goal of identifying the few patients with intracranial injury after minor head trauma has led to 2 approaches to computed tomography (CT) use in the United States: routinely scanning all patients with head trauma and loss of consciousness or reliance on clinical judgment to guide in CT use. Routine scanning results in large health care expenditures, whereas reliance on clinical judgment could reduce CT use, but at the cost of missing 20% of patients with intracranial injury.6-7

The authors of 2 well-publicized clinical decision instruments hoped to identify criteria to guide in CT use for patients with minor head injury.8-9 The . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Section of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Science Center, New Orleans.


RELATED ARTICLES

Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria in Patients With Minor Head Injury
Ian G. Stiell, Catherine M. Clement, Brian H. Rowe, Michael J. Schull, Robert Brison, Daniel Cass, Mary A. Eisenhauer, R. Douglas McKnight, Glen Bandiera, Brian Holroyd, Jacques S. Lee, Jonathan Dreyer, James R. Worthington, Mark Reardon, Gary Greenberg, Howard Lesiuk, Iain MacPhail, and George A. Wells
JAMA. 2005;294(12):1511-1518.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

External Validation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria for CT Scanning in Patients With Minor Head Injury
Marion Smits, Diederik W. J. Dippel, Gijs G. de Haan, Heleen M. Dekker, Pieter E. Vos, Digna R. Kool, Paul J. Nederkoorn, Paul A. M. Hofman, Albert Twijnstra, Hervé L. J. Tanghe, and M. G. Myriam Hunink
JAMA. 2005;294(12):1519-1525.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.