 |
 |

Nonoccupational HIV Postexposure Prophylaxis
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: We agree with the perspective of Drs Merchant and Mayer in their Commentary1 that the new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for provision of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis (HIV NPEP)2 represents an important initial step in advising clinicians. However, we note an important caveat with regard to the choice of antiretroviral agents, as discussed in the clinical guidelines developed by the New York State Department of Health AIDS Institute (NYSDOH AI) in 1997 and updated in December 2004.3-4
The CDC now endorses 3-drug HIV NPEP regimens rather than 2-drug regimens, as does the NYSDOH AI. Yet, the CDCs suggestion of efavirenz as an anchor of the simplest 3-drug regimens is concerning. In some resource-limited countries, efavirenz may be the only viable option to complete a postexposure prophylaxis regimen. However, in the United States, the Food and Drug Administration recently reclassified efavirenz . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Geoffrey A. Weinberg, MD
geoff_weinberg@urmc.rochester.edu Department of Pediatrics
Amneris E. Luque, MD
Department of Medicine University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry Rochester, NY
Sheldon T. Brown, MD
Department of Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine New York, NY For the members of the Steering Committee, New York State Department of Health AIDS Institute, HIV Clinical Guidelines Program, New York, NY.
RELATED ARTICLES
Nonoccupational HIV Postexposure ProphylaxisReply
Kenneth H. Mayer and Roland C. Merchant
JAMA. 2005;294(13):1615-1616.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Perspectives on New Recommendations for Nonoccupational HIV Postexposure Prophylaxis
Roland C. Merchant and Kenneth H. Mayer
JAMA. 2005;293(19):2407-2409.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|