This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (9)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Revascularization  • Cardiovascular System  • Surgery  • Surgical Interventions  • Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery  • Cardiovascular Intervention  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Jesse B. Hall, MD

JAMA. 2005;294:1693-1694.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Five years ago in JAMA,¹ I commended the critical care community for beginning in earnest the arduous process of evaluating the efficacy and effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) in the treatment of high-risk surgical patients and critically ill patients cared for in the intensive care unit (ICU). I deemed this process arduous because over the years following its introduction in the 1970s, this technology had found widespread application in the ICU and perioperative setting, despite a remarkable lack of high-quality evidence supporting such use. An observational retrospective study published in 1996 suggested PAC use might be associated with adverse outcome.² Thus, the proper study of PAC using prospective randomized study design represented a rigorous and necessary "back pedaling" from practice current at the time, never a simple process. In this issue of JAMA, 2 important articles concerning this evaluation process are published,^3-4 making . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Anesthesia and Critical Care, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness: The ESCAPE Trial
The ESCAPE Investigators and ESCAPE Study Coordinators*
JAMA. 2005;294(13):1625-1633.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of the Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Critically Ill Patients: Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
Monica R. Shah, Vic Hasselblad, Lynne W. Stevenson, Cynthia Binanay, Christopher M. O’Connor, George Sopko, and Robert M. Califf
JAMA. 2005;294(13):1664-1670.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Noninvasive Cardiac Output Measurement in Heart Failure Subjects on Circulatory Support
Phillips et al.
Anesth. Analg. 2009;108:881-886.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Anesthesia Practice in 2007: An Historical Overview With Emphasis on the Past 6 Years
Leibowitz and Oropello
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 2007;11:162-176.
ABSTRACT  

Pulmonary Artery Catheter Adds Little in Heart Failure Management
Journal Watch Cardiology 2005;2005:6-6.
FULL TEXT  

Pulmonary Artery Catheter Adds Little in Heart Failure Management
Journal Watch Cardiology 2005;2005:1-1.
FULL TEXT