You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 13, October 5, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Cardiovascular/ Cardiothoracic Surgery
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Revascularization
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Searching for Evidence to Support Pulmonary Artery Catheter Use in Critically Ill Patients

Jesse B. Hall, MD

JAMA. 2005;294:1693-1694.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Five years ago in JAMA,1 I commended the critical care community for beginning in earnest the arduous process of evaluating the efficacy and effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC) in the treatment of high-risk surgical patients and critically ill patients cared for in the intensive care unit (ICU). I deemed this process arduous because over the years following its introduction in the 1970s, this technology had found widespread application in the ICU and perioperative setting, despite a remarkable lack of high-quality evidence supporting such use. An observational retrospective study published in 1996 suggested PAC use might be associated with adverse outcome.2 Thus, the proper study of PAC using prospective randomized study design represented a rigorous and necessary "back pedaling" from practice current at the time, never a simple process. In this issue of JAMA, 2 important articles concerning this evaluation process are published,3-4 making . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Anesthesia and Critical Care, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.


RELATED ARTICLES

Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness: The ESCAPE Trial

JAMA. ;294():1625-1633.
FULL TEXT  

Impact of the Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Critically Ill Patients: Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
, , , , , , and
JAMA. ;294():1664-1670.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Anesthesia Practice in 2007: An Historical Overview With Emphasis on the Past 6 Years
Leibowitz and Oropello
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 2007;11:162-176.
ABSTRACT  

Pulmonary Artery Catheter Adds Little in Heart Failure Management
Journal Watch Cardiology 2005;2005:6-6.
FULL TEXT  

Pulmonary Artery Catheter Adds Little in Heart Failure Management
Journal Watch Cardiology 2005;2005:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.