You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 14, October 12, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (44)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Pay-for-Performance Research

How to Learn What Clinicians and Policy Makers Need to Know

R. Adams Dudley, MD, MBA

JAMA. 2005;294:1821-1823.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Pay-for-performance has become increasingly common in health care. According to recent surveys, almost 100 pay-for-performance initiatives nationwide are now sponsored by a variety of health plans, employer coalitions, and government purchasers that are intended to improve the quality of care provided.1

However, the rationale for pay-for-performance comes almost entirely from experience with incentives in other industries. Only 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pay-for-performance have been reported in the literature.2 Even these studies are not clearly applicable to current pay-for-performance because they all focus on performance for a single indicator or a single aspect of care (eg, preventive care), whereas most current pay-for-performance initiatives use multiple indicators for multiple conditions and types of care.1 Moreover, most studies have important flaws in reporting, such as the failure to note the market share of the organization offering the incentive in the practices of the providers being studied. . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Study Design

Author Affiliation: Institute for Health Policy Studies and Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Early Experience With Pay-for-Performance: From Concept to Practice
, , , and
JAMA. ;294():1788-1793.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Pay for Performance in Medicare: Evidentiary Irony and the Politics of Value
Tanenbaum
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2009;34:717-746.
ABSTRACT  

Evidence-Based Financial Incentives for Healthcare Reform: Putting It Together
Diamond and Kaul
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009;2:134-140.
FULL TEXT  

Pay for Performance in Behavioral Health
Bremer et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2008;59:1419-1429.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lessons From Evaluations of Purchaser Pay-for-Performance Programs: A Review of the Evidence
Christianson et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2008;65:5S-35S.
ABSTRACT  

Nonprimary Care Physicians' Views on Office-Based Quality Incentive and Improvement Programs
Murphy and Nash
American Journal of Medical Quality 2008;23:427-439.
ABSTRACT  

The Impact Of Pay-For-Performance On Health Care Quality In Massachusetts, 2001-2003
Pearson et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:1167-1176.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Beyond The Efficiency Index: Finding A Better Way To Reduce Overuse And Increase Efficiency In Physician Care
Greene et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:w250-w259.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Estimating Physician Effects on Glycemic Control in the Treatment of Diabetes: Methods, effects sizes, and implications for treatment policy
Tuerk et al.
Diabetes Care 2008;31:869-873.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Climbing Up The Pay-For-Performance Learning Curve: Where Are The Early Adopters Now?
Rosenthal et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:1674-1682.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pay for Performance, Public Reporting, and Racial Disparities in Health Care: How Are Programs Being Designed?
Chien et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2007;64:283S-304S.
ABSTRACT  

Pay for Performance Alone Cannot Drive Quality
Mandel and Kotagal
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:650-655.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Will Pay-For-Performance And Quality Reporting Affect Health Care Disparities?
Casalino et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:w405-w414.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

General Internists' Views On Pay-For-Performance And Public Reporting Of Quality Scores: A National Survey
Casalino et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:492-499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antibiotic Dosing Before Primary Hip and Knee Replacement as a Pay-for-Performance Measure
Bhattacharyya and Hooper
JBJS 2007;89:287-291.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

American College of Cardiology 2006 Principles to Guide Physician Pay-for-Performance Programs: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Work Group on Pay for Performance (A Joint Working Group of the ACC Quality Strategic Direction Committee and the ACC Advocacy Committee)
Brush et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:2603-2609.
FULL TEXT  

Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis.
Shojania et al.
JAMA 2006;296:427-440.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.