 |
 |

CLINICIANS CORNER
A 21-Year-Old Woman With Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance
George F. Sawaya, MD, Discussant
JAMA. 2005;294:2210-2218.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
INTRODUCTION
DR REYNOLDS: Ms G is a 21-year-old woman with a history of abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) tests.
Ms G first became sexually active at age 19. That year, she had her first gynecologic examination when she visited a doctor to ask for an oral contraceptive pill prescription. Her examination and cytology test were normal. She had annual Pap screening until age 21, when her cytology test (conventional) showed atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US). Her clinician, a nurse practitioner at student health, recommended a repeat cytology test in 6 months. Her repeat test again showed ASC-US, and she was referred to a gynecologist who performed a colposcopy.
On colposcopy, the entire squamocolumnar junction could be seen and her cervix showed grade 1 acetowhite changes. Biopsy revealed metaplasia. A liquid-based cytology test done at the time of the colposcopy was normal. . . . [Full Text of this Article]
MS G: HER VIEW
AT THE CROSSROADS: QUESTIONS FOR DR SAWAYA
Cervical Cancer and ASC-US Beginning Cervical Cancer Screening Liquid-Based vs Conventional Cytology Managing ASC-US: Colposcopy vs Repeat Cytology vs HPV DNA Testing
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MS G
QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Author Affiliation: Dr Sawaya is Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco; and Director of the Cervical Dysplasia Clinic at San Francisco General Hospital.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati
What's this?
RELATED LETTERS
Tests for Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance
Brian Budenholzer
JAMA. 2006;295(11):1247.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Tests for Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined SignificanceReply
George F. Sawaya
JAMA. 2006;295(11):1247-1248.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLES
Screen-and-Treat Approaches for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Low-Resource Settings: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Lynette Denny, Louise Kuhn, Michelle De Souza, Amy E. Pollack, William Dupree, and Thomas C. Wright, Jr
JAMA. 2005;294(17):2173-2181.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Feasibility of Management of High-Grade Cervical Lesions in a Single Visit: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Wendy R. Brewster, F. Allan Hubbell, Joan Largent, Argyrios Ziogas, Fritz Lin, Susan Howe, Theodore G. Ganiats, Hoda Anton-Culver, and Alberto Manetta
JAMA. 2005;294(17):2182-2187.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cervical Cancer Prevention: Making Programs More Appropriate and Pragmatic
Paul D. Blumenthal and Lynne Gaffikin
JAMA. 2005;294(17):2225-2228.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Adding Human Papillomavirus Testing to Cytology for Primary Cervical Cancer Screening: Shooting First and Asking Questions Later
Sawaya
ANN INTERN MED 2008;148:557-559.
FULL TEXT
Trials That Matter: Liquid-Based Cervical Cytology: Disadvantages Seem to Outweigh Advantages
Sawaya and Sox
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:668-669.
FULL TEXT
Tests for Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance
Budenholzer
JAMA 2006;295:1247-1247.
FULL TEXT
Cervical Cancer Prevention: Making Programs More Appropriate and Pragmatic
Blumenthal and Gaffikin
JAMA 2005;294:2225-2228.
FULL TEXT
|