You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 294 No. 17, November 2, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Sexually Transmitted Diseases
 •Gynecology
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Oncology
 •Cervical Cancer
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Cervical Cancer Prevention

Making Programs More Appropriate and Pragmatic

Paul D. Blumenthal, MD, MPH; Lynne Gaffikin, DrPH

JAMA. 2005;294:2225-2228.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Cervical cancer is unique for several reasons. It has recognized, well-described risk factors; there is an identifiable precancerous condition; the transition from precancer to cancer occurs over an extended period (10 years on average)1; screening tests for detecting cancer and precancer exist; and outpatient treatments for precancer are safe, effective, and relatively inexpensive.

Cervical cancer is also a rare, but confirmed, sequela of a sexually transmitted, high-risk human papillomavirus infection.2 Each year almost 500 000 new cases of cervical cancer are diagnosed and 230 000 deaths occur, 80% of which are in low-resource countries.3-4 Thus, more deaths result from human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer than from sequelae of all other sexually transmitted infections combined, with the recent exceptions of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and AIDS.5

Although the Papanicolaou test was developed almost 80 years ago, and cytology-based screening programs were initiated more . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md (Dr Blumenthal); and Evaluation and Research Technologies for Health Inc, Oakland, Calif (Dr Gaffikin).


RELATED ARTICLES

Screen-and-Treat Approaches for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Low-Resource Settings: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Lynette Denny, Louise Kuhn, Michelle De Souza, Amy E. Pollack, William Dupree, and Thomas C. Wright, Jr
JAMA. 2005;294(17):2173-2181.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Feasibility of Management of High-Grade Cervical Lesions in a Single Visit: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Wendy R. Brewster, F. Allan Hubbell, Joan Largent, Argyrios Ziogas, Fritz Lin, Susan Howe, Theodore G. Ganiats, Hoda Anton-Culver, and Alberto Manetta
JAMA. 2005;294(17):2182-2187.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 21-Year-Old Woman With Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance
George F. Sawaya
JAMA. 2005;294(17):2210-2218.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The potential of human papillomavirus vaccines.
Steinbrook
NEJM 2006;354:1109-1112.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.