 |
 |

Operating Characteristics of Prostate-Specific Antigen and Verification Bias
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: In their study of the operating characteristics of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in men with an initial PSA level of 3.0 ng/mL or lower, Dr Thompson and colleagues1 achieved a biopsy rate or verification rate of 65% from the participants in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT), corresponding to 5587 prostate biopsies. The authors do note that verification bias was present in their study, as those men who underwent biopsy were more likely to have a positive family history, to be of white race, and to be older than men who did not undergo biopsy. Accordingly, the authors adjusted for verification bias in their reported results.
In their discussion, the authors refer to a study in which we published PSA test characteristics after correcting for verification bias.2 They state that we "attempted to correct for verification bias, but the conditions necessary for verification bias adjustment were not strictly . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Rinaa S. Punglia, MD, MPH
rpunglia@partners.org Department of Radiation Oncology Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, Mass
Karen M. Kuntz, ScD
Department of Health Policy and Management Harvard School of Public Health Boston
William J. Catalona, MD
Department of Urology Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, Ill
Anthony DAmico, MD, PhD
Department of Radiation Oncology Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston
RELATED ARTICLES
Operating Characteristics of Prostate-Specific Antigen and Verification BiasReply
Donna Pauler Ankerst, Chen Chi, and Ian M. Thompson
JAMA. 2005;294(21):2698-2699.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Operating Characteristics of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Men With an Initial PSA Level of 3.0 ng/mL or Lower
Ian M. Thompson, Donna Pauler Ankerst, Chen Chi, M. Scott Lucia, Phyllis J. Goodman, John J. Crowley, Howard L. Parnes, and Charles A. Coltman, Jr
JAMA. 2005;294(1):66-70.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|